Mail signature for N N to ‘N@example.com’? [Y/n] y
[WARN] You have set arguments to pass to Mail::Mailer. Better fix your MTA. (Also, Mail::Mailer’s error reporting is non existant, so it won’t tell you when it doesn’t work.)
Can’t locate Mail/Mailer/mailer.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.1 /usr/local/share/perl/5.10.1 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.10 /usr/share/perl/5.10 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 499) line 3.

Currently I ended up with

$CONFIG{‘mailer-send’} = [ 'sendmail', '-f', 'timo.lindfors@iki.fi' ];

which requires me to set

export PERL_MAILERS=mail:/does/not/exists:sendmail:/usr/local/bin/enqueue.sh

in .bashrc.

What version of libmailtools-perl are you using?

Anyways, this is really cool. I only use enqueue.sh on my crypto-livesystem and then rsync the queue to my desktop. This means that I don’t need to change the livesystem every time my email setup changes (and I don’t need to have exim4 or msmtp even installed there).

indeed there has been talking about svg for some extended amount of time – but no visible action, quite the contrary – if you look into EIS, there’s a bunch of deleted CWS with svg in their name. Myself and others asking resulted in no useful answer, at least not in one that would make me assume there’ll be anything for 3.3. See also the history of http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Features (and the changes made). So the announcement in the quoted issue was exactly that for me – a nasty surprise. If this is all a simple misundertstanding, fine – but not, or sparsely, communicating tends to lead to situations like this. And that’s bad for a FLOSS project, as it is annoying, and sometimes even demotivating.

Of course my knowlegde on the development process is very limited, but we have been communicating about the very work on svg back in Autumn 2009…

So the tone of your remark may sound funny for some, it does not sound ok to me.

Yeahhh, that seems to be absolutely right and is definetely the experience I had with quite some code from you/some of your other Novell guys and many other people more, looking at some other code you and some of your colleagues left behind for the Evil(TM) Oracle Engineers to fix from time to time. I’d rather like to offer a 100% feature to our customers from the beginning, and that really doesn’t need any discussion with you.

And BTW: is Novell’s “Hacker (sic!) week” what I should read as ‘developing in stealth mode’, too? For myself, put Your thinking of FOSS wherever you want to and have fun.

BTW: Let’s wait and see, we didn’t reach code branch off by now…

so whats missing to be production ready?